Human behavior and identity have long intrigued philosophers, psychologists, and anyone who’s ever paused to wonder, Who am I really, and why do I act this way around different people? A concept that has circulated for centuries—sometimes attributed to various cultural philosophies—is the idea that each person carries three distinct personalities or “faces.”

1. The first is the public face we present to the world: polished, curated, and shaped by social norms.
2. The second is a more intimate self, revealed to close friends and relatives—often truer and less guarded than our public persona.
3. The third, according to this concept, is our deepest and most authentic self, known only to us. This hidden self might contain our unfiltered wishes, impulses, and thoughts that never see the light of day because they clash with the expectations and judgments of society.

But what does it mean to navigate these three layers as we go about our lives? Are we lying to ourselves most of the time if our “true” personality is always hidden? Are we deceiving other people by withholding the entirety of who we are? Or is this compartmentalization a natural, even necessary, way of existing in a complex social world?

In this post, we’ll explore these and other questions raised by the three-personality premise. We’ll look at why such distinctions might exist, how they impact our sense of identity, and whether this concept points to a universal truth—or just a thought-provoking metaphor. While we might not find definitive answers to every question, the conversation is worth having if it leads us to examine our own authenticity and how we connect with others.

The First Face: The Public Persona

One of the most visible aspects of our identity is the public persona—the version of ourselves we show to people we don’t know intimately. This might include colleagues, acquaintances, classmates, social media followers, or even strangers. It’s shaped by cultural values, societal expectations, and the roles we play in our day-to-day life.

• Social and Cultural Norms
  Society teaches us from an early age about acceptable behavior. We learn to share, to say “please” and “thank you,” to be polite, and to follow certain rituals that keep social life running smoothly. In many ways, this is beneficial: it makes large-scale cooperation possible, helps avoid conflicts, and establishes common ground for communication.

• Curated Image
  In the digital age, social media amplifies our tendency to curate how others see us. Posting flattering photos, sharing achievements, or presenting an image of success and happiness can be seen as normal. But it raises a question: If the public persona is heavily curated, where do we draw the line between honest self-expression and performance? For some, it may feel like a performance, while for others, it might be a genuine extension of their identity—just polished for public consumption.

• External Pressures
  Work environments and professional circles also demand certain behaviors. You might feel pressure to appear confident even if you’re unsure, or maintain a calm demeanor while under stress. These are roles we play, and they aren’t necessarily dishonest. Society often rewards people who appear stable, competent, and pleasant, and punishes those who don’t conform in certain ways.

Does this mean we’re “lying” whenever we adjust ourselves to fit external expectations? Maybe not always. Sometimes, our public persona still reflects real aspects of ourselves—just tidied up to varying degrees. However, the dissonance we feel between how we “must” act publicly and who we “really” are is a core concern of the three-personality premise.

The Second Face: The Private Persona with Friends and Family

If the public persona is like a protective coat we wear outside, the second face is a more relaxed version of ourselves—what we show to those we trust. This group might include family, close friends, or a romantic partner.

• More Freedom, Fewer Filters
  Around people we know intimately, we tend to reveal emotions and opinions more openly. The jokes can get sillier, the stories more honest, and the language less guarded. In these safe zones, we might not feel the same pressure to abide by formalities or social niceties; we can be blunt, sarcastic, playful, or openly affectionate.

• Authentic but Still Selective
  Even with close friends, we might hold back certain aspects of ourselves—perhaps we fear judgment, or we’ve learned through experience that not everyone can handle every truth. For instance, you might openly share your life troubles but hesitate to reveal certain fantasies, insecurities, or taboo opinions. Thus, while we might believe we’re being more “true” in these spaces, the filter is typically thinner yet still present.

• Variable Intimacy
  The closeness we share with family differs from the closeness with friends. A sibling who’s known you since childhood might see sides of you no friend ever will. Conversely, a best friend might understand your adult experiences in ways your parents never could. This fluidity raises a question: Is there even a single “second face,” or do we have multiple sub-layers of private selves? Possibly, we have overlapping versions of our private self, adjusting slightly for each intimate social circle.

While this private persona generally feels more genuine, it still functions within the boundaries of comfort and acceptance. This leads us to ponder whether the second face is simply a less restricted version of the public face—still shaped by the people around us and the environment we’re in.

The Third Face: The Hidden or “Truest” Self

Finally, the three-personality premise suggests a third face, the innermost self that only we know. This version of us carries our rawest emotions, our unspoken desires, our darkest doubts, and perhaps even traits we haven’t fully acknowledged.

• Beyond Societal Constraints
  In our innermost thoughts, we might entertain ideas that could seem bizarre, inappropriate, or taboo to others. Sometimes we might even judge ourselves for these thoughts—wondering what it says about who we are. But do these unfiltered impulses and daydreams represent our truest identity, or are they fleeting mental curiosities?

• Self-Deception and Fear
  It’s possible that a part of us truly knows the gap between who we appear to be and who we might be if we had no constraints. For some individuals, this gap can be a source of shame or anxiety. Are we “better people” for censoring ourselves, or are we depriving the world (and ourselves) of an authentic individual? It might also spark the question: If we’re aware of this “true self,” why don’t we share it? The answer often lies in fear—fear of rejection, alienation, or condemnation.

• The Mystery Within
  Sometimes, we don’t fully understand our hidden self. Our deepest drives may remain unconscious or only partially acknowledged. This is where psychoanalytical theories—like those proposed by Sigmund Freud or Carl Jung—enter the conversation, suggesting we have aspects of our psyche (the “id” or “shadow”) that remain out of view, even from ourselves. If this is the case, how can we claim that the third face is truly known to us at all?

This third face raises profound questions about authenticity. If it’s hidden, does that mean we’re all living a lie? Or is it normal—even healthy—to keep certain things private and unexplored? Could it be that this deep self is evolving and shaped by the very society we sometimes try to escape? These questions rarely have definitive answers, but they point us toward deeper introspection.

Are We Lying to Ourselves?

A pressing question that emerges is whether compartmentalizing these three faces amounts to self-deception. If the “real me” is never fully expressed, does that mean I’m living a dishonest life?

• Adaptation vs. Deception
  One perspective is that adaptation to different social situations isn’t necessarily deception. It can be a form of empathy or social intelligence—recognizing how to act in a way that respects the context. For example, you wouldn’t behave the same way in a funeral as you would at a birthday party, but that doesn’t make your behavior at either event a lie.

• Cognitive Dissonance
  Cognitive dissonance is the inner tension we feel when our actions don’t match our beliefs. If your public and private selves constantly clash with your hidden desires, you might experience stress or anxiety. This raises the question: How much can we stretch the gap between our outward behavior and our inward truth before it becomes unhealthy?

• Clinging to Multiple “Truths”
  Could it be that different facets of our behavior are all valid parts of a multifaceted identity? Some psychologists argue that the self isn’t singular but rather a mosaic of roles, contexts, and experiences. In that sense, you can be the caring parent, the goofy friend, the diligent employee, and the dreamer with hidden passions—all without necessarily being “fake.” Are these just different aspects of the same truth?

Ultimately, whether or not we’re lying to ourselves depends on how consciously and deliberately we present each face—and whether we feel a sense of internal alignment among them. The moment we lose sight of our personal truth, or if we deny it altogether, that might be the moment we start lying to ourselves.

Are We Deceiving Others?

Another dimension is whether we’re deceiving other people by not revealing the entirety of who we are. If our third face is truly known only to us—hidden even from spouses and close friends—does that constitute deception?

• Boundaries and Privacy
  In any relationship, there’s a balance between honesty and privacy. Withholding certain thoughts or desires might not necessarily be deceit; it could be a boundary we set for emotional safety or personal freedom. Not every truth needs to be broadcast. The question, then, is: Where do we draw the line between healthy boundaries and deception?

• The Illusion of Total Transparency
  Complete openness with another person is often considered an ideal in romantic or deep platonic relationships. However, is total transparency feasible, or even desirable? Even the closest partners can have personal spaces, private thoughts, and an internal dialogue that doesn’t need external validation. Some would argue that maintaining a private core can enrich a relationship by preserving individuality. Others might feel uneasy if they believe their partner is harboring unknown aspects of themselves.

• Contextual Truth
  Perhaps the version of us that each person experiences—colleague, best friend, or significant other—isn’t a lie but a contextual truth. The way we talk about ourselves, the jokes we share, and the vulnerability we show might all be sincere within a certain context. Does revealing only one dimension of ourselves necessarily invalidate the genuineness of that dimension?

Here, too, absolute answers are elusive. Some people may argue that partial truth is still truth, while others might insist that anything short of full disclosure is incomplete, and thus deceptive. The line can be blurry, and it might shift depending on individual comfort levels, cultural norms, and the expectations within each relationship.

Cultural and Historical Perspectives

It’s worth noting that the idea of multiple selves isn’t new. Various cultural traditions and philosophical schools have suggested, in one way or another, that humans wear different “masks” depending on the situation. Japanese folklore famously references the notion of “three faces,” though exact interpretations vary. Carl Jung wrote about the “persona” as a social mask we wear, distinct from the “shadow” self that houses the parts of us we don’t want to acknowledge. Sociologist Erving Goffman likened everyday social interactions to theater, where we perform certain roles on the “front stage” while keeping our private thoughts in the “back stage.”

These analogies challenge us to ask whether multiple personalities (not in the clinical sense, but in the everyday sense) are part of a normal, functional human society. If so, we might be neither deceiving others nor lying to ourselves—merely participating in a shared social script that allows us to coexist.

Additional Questions to Consider

1. At What Point Does Adaptation Become Inauthentic?
   Is there a threshold after which accommodating social norms changes us so fundamentally that we lose our sense of self?

2. Do We Have a Moral Duty to Show Our True Selves?
   Some might argue that society would be healthier if everyone were more transparent. Others believe privacy and discretion are essential.

3. How Do Power Dynamics Influence the Three Faces?
   For instance, if you’re in a vulnerable position (financially or socially), are you forced to hide your real feelings more often to avoid conflict or punishment?

4. Can We Ever Truly Know Our Third Face?
   If elements of our truest self lie in the unconscious, is it possible that we never fully know or understand it?

5. Does the Third Face Evolve Over Time?
   Maybe what’s hidden changes as we grow and adapt. The third face at age 20 might be different from the one at age 50.

These questions can deepen the conversation about how we define authenticity, identity, and integrity.

Final Thoughts (Without Final Answers)

So, are we all lying to ourselves and others most of the time? Or are we simply adaptive, multifaceted beings navigating a complex web of social relationships? The three-personality premise offers a powerful lens through which to examine our behavior, yet it leaves us with more questions than answers.

• Embracing Complexity
  It’s possible that humans are inherently complex and that having multiple selves is part of that complexity. We might never boil ourselves down to a single essence because we are shaped by experiences, relationships, and the contexts we find ourselves in.

• The Role of Introspection
  While we can’t give a blanket answer on whether hiding certain traits is inherently deceitful or simply cautious, introspection can help us realize when the gap between who we are and who we appear to be is causing us distress. Moments of honest self-reflection can clarify whether our public actions align with our personal values.

• Accepting Mystery
  It might be equally true that some aspects of our innermost self remain obscure even to us. Part of the human experience may be learning to live with that mystery, to continuously discover and rediscover who we are, and to refine or embrace our multiple faces over time.

Perhaps, in the end, the three-personality premise isn’t about accusing anyone of living a grand deception. Rather, it’s a framework that helps us see that human identity is layered—much like an onion, with outer layers that protect an inner core. Whether you see these layers as necessary adaptations, forms of polite subterfuge, or a combination of both, the crux of the matter is this:

We are all works in progress, each wearing different “faces” for reasons that might serve us, others, or society as a whole. The invitation is to remain curious about these faces, to question whether they serve our integrity and well-being, and to acknowledge that certain parts of us may never be fully unveiled to anyone but ourselves—and perhaps even we might only catch fleeting glimpses of them.

Categories: Uncategorized

Dattaprasad Tikale